<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pirates Trade Adam LaRoche</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rizzosports.com/news/2009/07/pirates-trade-adam-laroche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rizzosports.com/news/2009/07/pirates-trade-adam-laroche/</link>
	<description>Welcome to the RizzoSports.com News Section -- Pittsburgh Sports - WPIAL &#124; Pirates &#124; Steelers &#124; Pens &#124; Riverhounds &#124; + more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:55:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.rizzosports.com/news/2009/07/pirates-trade-adam-laroche/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rizzosports.com/news/?p=226#comment-23</guid>
		<description>While anyone who follows the Pirates should welcome this move, there is a rumor that this was yet another salary dump.  Allegedly, there was another team involved, one who offered a much better prospects package on condition the Pirates pay the rest of his &#039;09 salary.  How can they preach they&#039;re building for the future when they turn down more promising prospects for a measly couple million dollars?  This smacks of Nuttingism all the way.  And what&#039;s with them replacing LaRoche with Steve Pierce...a proven load (they say they have to find out about him).  Wouldn&#039;t it make more sense to put Garrett Jones at 1st and find out about Moss and Young.  You&#039;ve gotta keep Jones in the lineup and play both Moss and Young everyday, or does Jones&#039; future salary have HIM on the trading block already?  Way to go Bucs, just more historically stupid moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While anyone who follows the Pirates should welcome this move, there is a rumor that this was yet another salary dump.  Allegedly, there was another team involved, one who offered a much better prospects package on condition the Pirates pay the rest of his &#8217;09 salary.  How can they preach they&#8217;re building for the future when they turn down more promising prospects for a measly couple million dollars?  This smacks of Nuttingism all the way.  And what&#8217;s with them replacing LaRoche with Steve Pierce&#8230;a proven load (they say they have to find out about him).  Wouldn&#8217;t it make more sense to put Garrett Jones at 1st and find out about Moss and Young.  You&#8217;ve gotta keep Jones in the lineup and play both Moss and Young everyday, or does Jones&#8217; future salary have HIM on the trading block already?  Way to go Bucs, just more historically stupid moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
